Make your developers 2–3× more productive without hiring more of them.
Most small engineering teams already pay for Cursor or Copilot. Few have
an actual AI-native workflow. I audit what your developers do today,
install the right stack (Claude Code, Cursor, MCP servers, agent
skills), and leave you with a playbook the team will keep using after I
am gone.
Industry data from 2026 puts AI-augmented developers at 2–3× the
output of traditional ones. The teams that hit that number are not the
ones with the most expensive subscriptions — they are the ones with a
deliberate workflow: shared agent skills, MCP servers wired into their
stack, prompt patterns the whole team uses, and review processes that
catch what AI gets wrong.
What I actually deliver
Stack decisions — Claude Code
vs Cursor vs Copilot, where each fits in your workflow, what the team
budget should be.
MCP server setup — wired into
your repo, CI, ticketing, and docs so agents have real context.
Shared skills and hooks — codified
team conventions, review checklists, and project-level config checked
into the repo.
Workshops with your developers — not slides. Live coding through real tickets from your backlog.
Before / after measurement — so you can defend the spend to whoever signs cheques.
Why me
17 years building software, four companies, currently shipping
LeadCognition with a small AI-native team. I run the exact stack I
will install — Claude Code, Cursor, MCP servers across Linear,
GitHub, Cloudflare, Postgres, Attio, PostHog, Sentry. This is what I
do every day, not a deck I assembled to sell.
Pricing
Fixed scope. Fixed price. Honest math.
AI-Native Dev Audit
Map the gap. Get the playbook.
$2,500 fixed, one-time
1 week
1:1 interview with each developer on your team
Audit of current stack: IDE, repo, CI, ticketing, review
Written playbook: tool stack (Claude Code / Cursor / Copilot), MCP servers, agent workflows, prompt patterns, guardrails, cost model
All prices in USD. Fixed-price engagements invoiced 100% upfront via
Payoneer. Retainers monthly in advance, 3-month minimum. Hourly blocks
pre-paid, valid 6 months. VAT/GST handled per jurisdiction.
Who is this for?
Engineering teams of 3–15 developers who have not yet rolled out AI-native tooling, or have rolled it out unevenly and are not seeing measurable productivity gains. Works best when the founder or head of engineering wants ownership, not a vendor pitch.
Which tools do you set up?
Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, MCP servers, shared agent skills and hooks, project-level config. The exact mix depends on your stack, language, and review process. The audit picks it.
How do I pay?
Payoneer is the default — I send a payment request once we agree on scope. Wise and Stripe (cards) also available. Fixed tiers invoice 100% upfront; retainers monthly in advance.
What if the team resists?
Most teams resist because earlier AI tools were oversold. The workshops use real tickets from your backlog so the value shows up in week one, not week six. If a developer stays unconvinced, that is fine — the playbook lets the rest of the team move.
Do you sign NDAs?
Yes. Mutual NDA before any code or repo access. Engagement contract is a 2-page MSA + SOW per tier.
Can you start this week?
Audits usually start within 5 business days. Sprints within 2 weeks. Retainers when slot opens — typically 2-4 weeks out.
Not sure which tier?
Book a free 30-minute call. I will tell you honestly.
I will ask about your team, your stack, and what "efficient" means
in dollars. If the answer is "you do not need me," I will tell you
that too.